NO QUARTER
The Rules of War, Pete Hegseth and Mental Illness
Sometimes a story is not about missiles or maps. Sometimes it’s about a single phrase.
Earlier today, during a Pentagon press briefing in Arlington, Virginia, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was describing ongoing U.S. military operations tied to the conflict with Iran. In the middle of the usual talk about strategy and pressure, he said something that made reporters sit up straight.
“We will keep pressing, keep advancing, no quarter, no mercy for our enemies.”
That phrase has a long history. And it is not a casual one. In plain English, “no quarter” means refusing to spare an enemy, even if they surrender. In the law of war, ordering troops to give no quarter, to take no prisoners and kill those who surrender, is explicitly prohibited. The prohibition goes back centuries and is codified in modern international law, including the Geneva Conventions and U.S. military law.
That is why the phrase carries so much weight.
The U.S. military actually trains soldiers on this point. In the U.S. Army Field Manual on the Law of Land Warfare, it states that declaring that no quarter will be given is illegal. Even threatening it can violate the laws governing armed conflict.
Which raises the obvious question: why would a U.S. defense secretary use that phrase at all?
To be fair, there are two possibilities. One is that it was rhetorical bluster, the kind of tough-guy language Hegseth has used when he wants to sound like he knows something about being in a command position in wartime.
The other possibility is more troubling. That the phrase reflects a mindset that sees this conflict not as a limited military campaign but as a struggle where restraint and international norms are becoming optional.
The difference matters.
Words from the Pentagon are not barroom talk. They are signals to commanders, allies, adversaries, and the public. When a defense secretary uses language historically associated with war crimes, it sends a message whether he intended it or not.
And in a moment when the world is already on edge, with American forces striking targets in the Middle East and Iran warning of retaliation, the last thing anyone should want is ambiguity about whether the United States still believes in the basic rules of war.
The laws that prohibit “no quarter” orders were not written by pacifists. They were written by soldiers who had seen what happens when war loses its limits.
They knew something simple. Once the idea spreads that surrender offers no protection, wars get uglier, faster.
So yes, people should talk about that phrase. We should all talk about how irresponsible, amateurish and mentally ill Pete Hegseth is. And how his deficiencies reflect globally on the actions of the United States of America.
Because sometimes a single sentence tells you more about where things might be heading than a hundred pages of strategy documents. —
03/13/2026 Sources: Pentagon press briefing transcript, March 13, 2026; PBS NewsHour coverage of U.S. military operations and briefing remarks; Reuters reporting on Hegseth statements and law-of-war implications; U.S. Army Field Manual FM 27-10, The Law of Land Warfare; Geneva Conventions (Common Article 3 and related prohibitions on denying quarter).
douglasarthurjohnson.substack.com
Independent analysis. Subscribe free.
#douglasarthurjohnson